The attempted Coup de` tat by the media...

Interesting, the story that sailed a million reporters boats began with just an accusation by the IAEA and the pair of the New York Times and CBS. Seven reporters supposedly worked on the story before it appeared Monday in the TIMES, the only thing missing were the facts.
Three days later it is becoming more and more clear, that 38 truck loads of high explosives did not get looted but were moved by Saddam Hussein himself. Yet this is still unclear, but the evidence does suggest this...

(http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7307)

What is very interesting is the fact that the subsequent stories are the ones full of facts and details. SO did NYTIMES just rush the story to place a HIT on BUSH?
Of Course they did, and CBS planned the HIT on 60 MINUTES for hte 31st.
All indications are that the explosives should not have been tagged by teh UN rather they should have been destroyed by them (AL Barradi and BLix et. al). What is amazing is that these important weapons are more important to the left and the media after the war than they were before the war.

The media should due its research and due diligence before a story goes to press not after...this has been an attempt to influence the election--clearly!