Bolton, and Presidential power
The Presidents choice to head our delegation at the United Nations is being held up by the Democrats in the Senate along with a few stragglers in the the GOP ranks, but why?
To the best anyone can tell, it is because he is a tough and unrelenting boss. Difficult and demanding!?
No it is not that he has previously missappropriated funds, leaked information to the press, rather it is they don't like him much. Forget the fact that the witnesses to his Senate prosecution have been clearly motivated by partisan politics, he still is not worthy of the job.
We should look, for a moment, at the job he is being nominated for. Ambassador to the UN. Hell, with the UN recent history they may well be right.
Yes, you read correctly.
WE may need someone who has a greater experience is impropriety. Someone with experience in nafarious actions. Like...Sen. Biden who has a history of plagerism. Maybe Sen. Kennedy who has a history of manslaugther, or Sen. Byrd who has a history of rabid discrimination and leadership in anti civil rights movements. Possibly a person who has a history of habitual disgraceful conduct with women like Sen. Dodd or a proven liar, self promoter, and self professed war criminal Sen. Kerry. We could also choose a Senator who has worked to cover up huge land deals, insider trading and and who has experience working on behalf of the United States Communist Party as Senator Clinton has done.
Or we can just vote to approve a gentleman who has been nominated 4 previous times without a nary of negative testimony in the past...Oh, well that would be Bolton.
How hypocritical it is for the Senate to suddenly find religion when they have approved this man four times before. It is very similar to the Justices who have come up several times before for Federal District and Appeals level seats and cleared easily but suddenly the Senate now finds objection to them. Either the Senators did not do thier job the first time or times with a particular nominee or they are not doing it now. The Malfeasence is not on behalf of Bolton or these justices it is by the Senate.
How can a body of hypocrits sit in judgement of a fine man and drag his name through the media simply for politics...well leave it to the Democrats in the Senate and some in the House to work to destroy a persons reprutation for political reasons.
The President has the right to nominate people he seeks to work with, though the Democrats have tried to prevent this.
To the best anyone can tell, it is because he is a tough and unrelenting boss. Difficult and demanding!?
No it is not that he has previously missappropriated funds, leaked information to the press, rather it is they don't like him much. Forget the fact that the witnesses to his Senate prosecution have been clearly motivated by partisan politics, he still is not worthy of the job.
We should look, for a moment, at the job he is being nominated for. Ambassador to the UN. Hell, with the UN recent history they may well be right.
Yes, you read correctly.
WE may need someone who has a greater experience is impropriety. Someone with experience in nafarious actions. Like...Sen. Biden who has a history of plagerism. Maybe Sen. Kennedy who has a history of manslaugther, or Sen. Byrd who has a history of rabid discrimination and leadership in anti civil rights movements. Possibly a person who has a history of habitual disgraceful conduct with women like Sen. Dodd or a proven liar, self promoter, and self professed war criminal Sen. Kerry. We could also choose a Senator who has worked to cover up huge land deals, insider trading and and who has experience working on behalf of the United States Communist Party as Senator Clinton has done.
Or we can just vote to approve a gentleman who has been nominated 4 previous times without a nary of negative testimony in the past...Oh, well that would be Bolton.
How hypocritical it is for the Senate to suddenly find religion when they have approved this man four times before. It is very similar to the Justices who have come up several times before for Federal District and Appeals level seats and cleared easily but suddenly the Senate now finds objection to them. Either the Senators did not do thier job the first time or times with a particular nominee or they are not doing it now. The Malfeasence is not on behalf of Bolton or these justices it is by the Senate.
How can a body of hypocrits sit in judgement of a fine man and drag his name through the media simply for politics...well leave it to the Democrats in the Senate and some in the House to work to destroy a persons reprutation for political reasons.
The President has the right to nominate people he seeks to work with, though the Democrats have tried to prevent this.
posted by Tom Gaitens at 4:38 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home